Dream State
Aug. 4th, 2004 08:38 amEldar woke up this morning chuckling, "Chaos Reigns!"
He'd been dreaming about that "Amendment 2," the one defining marriage as "between one man and one woman."
Interesting mind that man has.
In his dream, the pols decided to further clarify what they wanted by adding the term "natural-born" to both "man" and "woman." Of course, this was challenged clear up to the Supreme Court of DreamState.....on the grounds that n-b did NOT include those born by Cesarean, induced labor, etc.; and this phrasing was UPHELD by the court! With one strike of the gavel, thousands if not millions of marriages were invalidated!
That's where he woke up.
When he described it to me, i added that it would also include, by inference (if that's the right word), those CONCEIVED by non-natural means...fertilty drugs, in vitro, etc.....just to be ornery :)
Also, however, this phrasing would mean that persons born a different sex than they are now (who have had SRS) would be able to marry someone of the same sex they are now, providing that the second person had not ALSO had SRS.....
He'd been dreaming about that "Amendment 2," the one defining marriage as "between one man and one woman."
Interesting mind that man has.
In his dream, the pols decided to further clarify what they wanted by adding the term "natural-born" to both "man" and "woman." Of course, this was challenged clear up to the Supreme Court of DreamState.....on the grounds that n-b did NOT include those born by Cesarean, induced labor, etc.; and this phrasing was UPHELD by the court! With one strike of the gavel, thousands if not millions of marriages were invalidated!
That's where he woke up.
When he described it to me, i added that it would also include, by inference (if that's the right word), those CONCEIVED by non-natural means...fertilty drugs, in vitro, etc.....just to be ornery :)
Also, however, this phrasing would mean that persons born a different sex than they are now (who have had SRS) would be able to marry someone of the same sex they are now, providing that the second person had not ALSO had SRS.....
no subject
Date: 2004-08-11 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-15 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-16 11:48 am (UTC)